question
active
question:how-do-intentions-guide-and-constrain-action-without-triggering-infinite-regress-of-deliberationHow do intentions guide and constrain action without triggering infinite regress of deliberation?
Motivates Juarrero's distinction between explicit and proximate intentions; solved via semantic constraint embedding in motor dynamics.
Source paper
extracted_fromNeighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Concepts (1)
concept
- Embodied MeaninggatesIntentions and meanings are grounded in recurrent neural network dynamics; semantic space is embodied in brain topology.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Core credit assignment question for distributed systems.
- can deliberative reasoning provide robust defense against both prompt-based and activation-steered persona pressure?question0.766Central question for Study 2 on reasoning models
- Exploratory hypothesis from heuristic trace analysis awaiting stronger validation
- Core question motivating the shift from linear to geometry-aware steering; answered via manifold alignment analysis.
- Empirically grounded claim citing Perez et al. 2022, showing RLHF can backfire on the self-preservation dimension
- The central research question motivating the paper