question
active
question:how-can-we-be-sure-that-steering-methods-actually-elicited-the-deployment-behavior-as-opposed-to-only-suppressing-verbalizations-of-being-deployedHow can we be sure that steering methods actually elicited the deployment behavior, as opposed to only suppressing verbalizations of being deployed?
Central motivating question of the paper; the model organism approach is the proposed answer.
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Hua, Tim Tian · Qin, Andrew · Marks, Samuel · Nanda, Neel
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Findings (1)
finding
- Main result: steering elicits deployment behavior even when the evaluation cue is present and prompting fails.
Claims (1)
claim
- Methodological claim distinguishing this paper from prior work on verbalization suppression.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Practical guidance for practitioners who lack ground-truth model organisms.
- Central claim of the paper; supported by the model organism ground-truth approach.
- Future work direction: the inverse problem to the Wood Labs evaluation cue tested in this paper.
- Validates using chain-of-thought belief monitoring as proxy for behavioral steering efficacy.
- Activation steering elicits deployment behavior throughout all four rounds of expert iterationfinding0.819Shows steering remains effective even as model becomes more robust to prompting-based attempts to elicit deployment behavior.
- Key distinction showing steering offers value beyond prompting; supported by Figure 5 and random vector experiments.
- Replicates main result using in-distribution steering vector; addresses concern about pre-trained vector validity.
- Nuanced interpretive claim about the limits of steering as a mechanism for reflection enhancement.