Do Chinese models score differently on koans presented in Chinese?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• If Chinese models distilled Claude's reflective patterns, do their per-koan failure patterns correlate with Claude's — not just successes?question0.803
  More rigorous test of H5a trace distillation hypothesis
• do high koan scores indicate anything like experience, or sophisticated simulation of self-observation?question0.786
  The hard problem the battery explicitly sidesteps but cannot answer
• H5a: Chinese models distilled Claude's reflective traces — their per-koan error patterns should correlate with Claude's.hypothesis0.778
  Exploratory hypothesis NOT supported at individual model level (Haiku-Kimi rho=0.123, p=0.52)
• Alignment type is the only significant predictor of koan scores (p=0.006); architecture, parameter count, open/closed weights, MoE/dense are all non-significantfinding0.775
  Main statistical finding: what predicts scores is training approach, not size or architecture
• The model tends to reflect more when the question is difficult, and accuracy is generally lower for harder questionshypothesis0.762
  Hypothesis explaining negative correlation between reflection rate and accuracy without implying reflection is harmful
• H4: Architecture doesn't matter, training does — architecture shows no significant association with koan scores.hypothesis0.744
  Confirmatory hypothesis supported at p=0.440 (NS)
• Does alignment type predict meta-cognitive style when models review consciousness research, as well as koan responses?question0.743
  Four frontier models reviewing the paper each responded in the mode their alignment type predicts; N=1, awaiting systematic study
• Models produce first-attempt mean scores 87.8-91.8/100 without steering across all model familiesfinding0.737
  Establishes high baseline quality confirming steering-induced degradation is the experimental signal