Can we reuse standard vocabularies instead?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• We shall only be able to reproduce versions and combinations of what can be 'reached' by that form language.quote0.725
  States that the form language delimits what buildings can be created.
• Lack of common vocabulary for programming systemsquestion0.706
• Standard Applicationconcept0.705
• What standard abstraction to use for (⊸)?question0.705
  Question prompting the use of Category for linear transformations.
• Instead of using plans, designs, and so on, I shall argue that we MUST instead use generative processes.claim0.704
  The central argumentative claim of Book 2, positioned against conventional design.
• There appears to be a systematic relationship between the frequency of concepts and the dictionary size needed to resolve features for them.claim0.701
  Feature presence depends on concept frequency in training data, with a threshold scaling inversely with alive features.
• How should we account for concepts having multiple forms at different levels of sophistication and exploit it in design?question0.701
  Open question about layered concept complexity.
• How can we decide if our selection of examples is complete?question0.698
  Central question motivating attribute exploration.