Can uniformity be expressed in more basic terms? And can its different aspects be unified into a more compelling and simpler criterion?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Uniformity Criterionclaim0.818
• Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.quote0.776
  Einstein's assertion invoked to explain why BMR preserves accuracy while reducing complexity
• The unity is not merely a unity in the surface, in the appearance of things — it is a unity of the most fundamental kind, which goes to the raw reality and which has, when it occurs, a highly unexpected, sometimes rambling, sometimes ferocious, sometimes friendly, even sometimes absurdly crude or comfortable character.claim0.770
  True unity is not about conventional beauty but about a raw, messy, everyday reality that resonates deeply.
• Due to its elementary yet powerful formal theory, FCA can express other methods, and therefore has the potential to unify the methodology of data analysis.claim0.769
  Ganter's assertion about FCA's foundational role and integrative potential in data analysis.
• If Humans Lack Uniform Welldefined Values And Strugglequestion0.765
• A person's own feeling of wholeness is the very best criterion for the wholeness of a thing he is trying to make.claim0.758
• What exactly, then, is wholeness?question0.746
  Central question of the chapter, answered by defining wholeness as the structure of nested centers.
• There appears to be a systematic relationship between the frequency of concepts and the dictionary size needed to resolve features for them.claim0.744
  Feature presence depends on concept frequency in training data, with a threshold scaling inversely with alive features.