Can architecture go that far?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• What I have shown gives a first very rough approximation to a necessary morphology of architecture.claim0.785
• This gives us a first very rough approximation to a necessary morphology of architecture.quote0.767
• Architecture cannot be good so long as we try to do it within a mechanical conception of matter.claim0.749
  The impossibility of good architecture under mechanistic cosmology.
• When you are done, if you have reached what you aim for, you feel the impact of its 'presence.' This is how architecture comes about.claim0.746
  Defines the experiential criterion — felt presence — as the endpoint and definition of successful architecture
• Architectural 'design,' the 20th-century process, does not work and cannot work in principle.claim0.744
• This is the moment when the building becomes architecture.claim0.741
  The brutal geometric moment — making positive elements, syncopated harmony, massive stones — is what transforms mere building into architecture
• How can the Fifteen Properties be meaningfully applied to domains beyond architecture and design?question0.738
  Motivating question suggesting that deeper understanding of property interactions would enable broader application of Alexander's framework.
• A building has too many variables; we cannot get each aspect right unless it is possible to work out one aspect at a time, step by step.claim0.737
  Direct application of the coin argument to building design and construction.