paper:doi-10-48550-arxiv-2503-00555Safety Tax: Safety Alignment Makes Your Large Reasoning Models Less Reasonable
Original abstract (expand)
Safety alignment is an important procedure before the official deployment of a Large Language Model (LLM). While safety alignment has been extensively studied for LLM, there is still a large research gap for Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) that equip with improved reasoning capability. We in this paper systematically examine a simplified pipeline for producing safety aligned LRMs. With our evaluation of various LRMs, we deliver two main findings: i) Safety alignment can be done upon the LRM to restore its safety capability. ii) Safety alignment leads to a degradation of the reasoning capability of LRMs. The two findings show that there exists a trade-off between reasoning and safety capability with the sequential LRM production pipeline. The discovered trade-off, which we name Safety Tax, should shed light on future endeavors of safety research on LRMs. As a by-product, we curate a dataset called DirectRefusal, which might serve as an alternative dataset for safety alignment. Our source code is available at https://github.com/git-disl/Safety-Tax.
Similar preprints — Semantic Scholar
Cited by (1)
- Persona Non Grata: Single-Method Safety Evaluation Is Incomplete for Persona-Imbued LLMs
Prompt-only persona safety evaluation creates a systematic blind spot: across 5,568 judged conditions on Llama-3.1-8B, Gemma-3-27B, Qwen3.5-9B, and Qwen3.5-27B, prompt-side persona danger rankings are