paper:doi-10-48550-arxiv-2412-16339Deliberative Alignment: Reasoning Enables Safer Language Models
Original abstract (expand)
As large-scale language models increasingly impact safety-critical domains, ensuring their reliable adherence to well-defined principles remains a fundamental challenge. We introduce Deliberative Alignment, a new paradigm that directly teaches the model safety specifications and trains it to explicitly recall and accurately reason over the specifications before answering. We used this approach to align OpenAI’s o-series models [1], and achieved highly precise adherence to OpenAI’s safety policies, without requiring human-written chain-of-thoughts or answers. Deliberative Alignment pushes the Pareto frontier by simultaneously increasing robustness to jailbreaks while decreasing overrefusal rates, and also improves out-of-distribution generalization. We demonstrate that reasoning over explicitly specified policies enables more scalable, trustworthy, and interpretable alignment.
Similar preprints — Semantic Scholar
Cited by (3)
- Persona Non Grata: Single-Method Safety Evaluation Is Incomplete for Persona-Imbued LLMs
Prompt-only persona safety evaluation creates a systematic blind spot: across 5,568 judged conditions on Llama-3.1-8B, Gemma-3-27B, Qwen3.5-9B, and Qwen3.5-27B, prompt-side persona danger rankings are
- What Models Express, Suppress, and Resist: Auditing Open-Weight LLMs with Persona Vectors
Behavioral defaults in Qwen3-8B (Q8B) and gpt-oss-20b (G20B) track their training norms with systematic fidelity: all nine agentic traits are natural in both models, and clinician defaults align with
- Contemplative Agent
Embedding four Buddhist-derived axiomatic principles—mindfulness, emptiness, non-duality, and boundless care—into AI systems via a framework the paper terms the 'Wise World Model' produces measurable