paper:doi-10-48550-arxiv-2212-03827Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision
Original abstract (expand)
Existing techniques for training language models can be misaligned with the truth: if we train models with imitation learning, they may reproduce errors that humans make; if we train them to generate text that humans rate highly, they may output errors that human evaluators can't detect. We propose circumventing this issue by directly finding latent knowledge inside the internal activations of a language model in a purely unsupervised way. Specifically, we introduce a method for accurately answering yes-no questions given only unlabeled model activations. It works by finding a direction in activation space that satisfies logical consistency properties, such as that a statement and its negation have opposite truth values. We show that despite using no supervision and no model outputs, our method can recover diverse knowledge represented in large language models: across 6 models and 10 question-answering datasets, it outperforms zero-shot accuracy by 4\% on average. We also find that it cuts prompt sensitivity in half and continues to maintain high accuracy even when models are prompted to generate incorrect answers. Our results provide an initial step toward discovering what language models know, distinct from what they say, even when we don't have access to explicit ground truth labels.
Similar preprints — Semantic Scholar
Cited by (7)
- Steering at the Source: Style Modulation Heads for Robust Persona Control
Residual-stream activation steering reliably degrades text coherency when steering vectors push models toward out-of-distribution behavior, and this collapse goes undetected by standard benchmarks: MM
- Evaluating Language Model Character Traits
Claude-instant-1.2 achieves 91.1% accuracy and 88.6% logical coherence on 696 valid Leap-of-Thought entailment tuples — highest among 15 tested models including GPT-4 (89.9% accuracy, 84.7% coherence)
- Testing the Limits of Truth Directions in LLMs
Linear truth directions in LLMs are reliable primarily for simple factual retrieval and break down as soon as truth assessment requires tracking intermediate results—a finding that sharply constrains
- The Non-Linear Representation Dilemma: Is Causal Abstraction Enough for Mechanistic Interpretability?
Under arbitrarily powerful alignment maps, causal abstraction becomes vacuous: any neural network can be perfectly mapped to any algorithm, a result proven formally in Theorem 1 under five mild assump
- The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasets
At sufficient scale, LLMs linearly represent the truth or falsehood of factual statements in their internal activations — a claim supported by PCA visualizations, cross-dataset probe transfer, and cau
- When Thinking LLMs Lie: Unveiling the Strategic Deception in Representations of Reasoning Models
Strategic deception in chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning models is measurable, inducible, and controllable via representation engineering—a finding with direct implications for AI alignment. Applied to
- Quantitative Introspection in Language Models: Tracking Emotive States Across Conversation
Quantitative introspection—the causal coupling between an instruction-tuned LLM's numeric self-report and a probe-defined internal emotive direction—is demonstrably present in models as small as LLaMA