paper:doi-10-18653-v1-2024-acl-long-102InCharacter: Evaluating Personality Fidelity in Role-Playing Agents through Psychological Interviews
Original abstract (expand)
Role-playing agents (RPAs), powered by large language models, have emerged as a flourishing field of applications. However, a key challenge lies in assessing whether RPAs accurately reproduce the personas of target characters, namely their character fidelity. Existing methods mainly focus on the knowledge and linguistic patterns of characters. This paper, instead, introduces a novel perspective to evaluate the personality fidelity of RPAs with psychological scales. Overcoming drawbacks of previous self-report assessments on RPAs, we propose InCharacter, namely Interviewing Character agents for personality tests. Experiments include various types of RPAs and LLMs, covering 32 distinct characters on 14 widely used psychological scales. The results validate the effectiveness of InCharacter in measuring RPA personalities. Then, with InCharacter, we show that state-of-the-art RPAs exhibit personalities highly aligned with the human-perceived personalities of the characters, achieving an accuracy up to 80.7%.
Similar preprints — Semantic Scholar
Cited by (2)
- Facet-Level Persona Control by Trait-Activated Routing with Contrastive SAE for Role-Playing LLMs
Facet-level personality control in role-playing LLMs is substantially improved by injecting contrastively trained sparse autoencoder (SAE) control vectors into mid-residual layers, with the CV-SAE+Pro
- Spotting Out-of-Character Behavior: Atomic-Level Evaluation of Persona Fidelity in Open-Ended Generation
Conventional response-level persona evaluation systematically inflates fidelity scores by collapsing multi-sentence outputs into a single score, masking sentence-level Out-of-Character (OOC) deviation