paper:bricken-towards-monosemanticity-decomposing-lang-2023Towards monosemanticity: Decomposing language models with dictionary learning
Methods (5)
- Activation Interval SamplingDividing feature activation spectrum into 11 evenly-spaced intervals and sampling uniformly to evaluate monosemanticity across activation levels
- Attribution SimilarityCorrelating attribution vectors (feature activation × logit weight of next token) across model pairs to measure functional universality
- Feature Interpretability Rubric14-point scoring rubric for human evaluation of feature interpretability covering confidence, activation consistency, logit consistency, and specificity
- Masked Cosine SimilarityCosine similarity between feature activations restricted to tokens where one of the features fires; used to identify feature splitting relationships
- Neuron ResamplingPeriodically reinitializing dead autoencoder neurons using high-loss data points to improve feature coverage
Frameworks (2)
- DisentanglementRelated research agenda seeking representations that separate conceptually distinct factors; contrasted with superposition approach
- Sparse Autoencoder for Dictionary LearningPrimary method introduced: trains a one-hidden-layer MLP with L1 sparsity penalty to decompose model activations into overcomplete feature dictionaries
Datasets (2)
- 8 Billion MLP Activation SamplesDataset of transformer MLP activations used to train sparse autoencoders; collected from 40M contexts
- The PileTraining corpus used for the 67M-parameter model tested with VPD.
Related work— refs + corpus + external arXiv
Cited / in-corpus / arXiv badges show which signals surfaced each row. Multi-source rows weighted higher.
- Monet: Mixture of Monosemantic Experts for TransformersYoung Jin Ahn, Kee-Eung Kim, Jaewoo Kang Jungwoo Park2025≈ 76%
- A Pattern Language for Machine Learning TasksIan Fan, Tuomas Laakkonen, Neil John Ortega, Thomas Hoffmann, Vincent Wang-Mascianica Benjamin Rodatz2025≈ 76%
- A Monosemantic Attribution Framework for Stable Interpretability in Clinical Neuroscience Large Language ModelsTiago Azevedo, Cristian Cosentino, Chiara D'Ercoli, Subati Abulikemu, Zhongtian Sun, Richard Bethlehem, Pietro Lio Michail Mamalakis2026≈ 75%
- A Unified Theory of Sparse Dictionary Learning in Mechanistic Interpretability: Piecewise Biconvexity and Spurious MinimaHarshvardhan Saini, Zhaoqian Yao, Zheng Lin, Yizhen Liao, Jingyi Cui, Yisen Wang, Mengnan Du, Dianbo Liu Yiming Tang2026≈ 75%
- Multi-Agent Language Models: Advancing Cooperation, Coordination, and AdaptationArjun Vaithilingam Sudhakar2025≈ 75%
- Majorization Minimization Technique for Optimally Solving Deep Dictionary LearningVanika Singhal and Angshul Majumdar2019≈ 75%
- Learning to Model the World with LanguageYuqing Du, Olivia Watkins, Danijar Hafner, Pieter Abbeel, Dan Klein, Anca Dragan Jessy Lin2024≈ 75%
- Vocabulary Expansion of Large Language Models via Kullback-Leibler-Based Self-DistillationMax Rehman Linder2026≈ 74%
- The Rate-Distortion-Polysemanticity Tradeoff in SAEsFrancesco Locatello Tommaso Mencattini and Francesco Montagna2026≈ 74%
- Semantic Convergence: Investigating Shared Representations Across Scaled LLMsSanjana Rathore, Andrew Rufail, Adrian Simon, Daniel Zhang, Soham Dave, Cole Blondin, Kevin Zhu, Sean O'Brien Daniel Son2025≈ 74%
- Dictionary Learning under Symmetries via Group RepresentationsAaron Y. R. Low, Yong Sheng Soh, Zhuohang Feng, and Brendan K. Y. Tan Subhroshekhar Ghosh2026≈ 74%
- Lost in Multilinguality: Dissecting Cross-lingual Factual Inconsistency in Transformer Language ModelsHeike Adel, Lukas Lange, Yihong Liu, Ercong Nie, Jannik Str\"otgen, Hinrich Sch\"utze Mingyang Wang2025≈ 74%
- Measuring and Guiding MonosemanticityFelix Friedrich, Manuel Brack, Stephan W\"aldchen, Bj\"orn Deiseroth, Patrick Schramowski, Kristian Kersting Ruben H\"arle2025≈ 74%
- Probing Task-Oriented Dialogue Representation from Language ModelsChien-Sheng Wu and Caiming Xiong2020≈ 74%
- ≈ 74%
- Interpreting Language Model Parametersin corpus2026≈ 73%
- ≈ 71%
- ≈ 71%
- Mechanistic Knobs in LLMs: Retrieving and Steering High-Order Semantic Features via Sparse Autoencodersin corpus2026≈ 71%
- ≈ 71%
- Model Alignment Searchin corpus2025≈ 70%
- ≈ 70%
- The Platonic Representation Hypothesisin corpus2024≈ 69%
- Active Inference, Curiosity and Insightin corpus2017≈ 69%
- ≈ 68%
- Denotational Design: from meanings to programsin corpus2015≈ 68%
- ≈ 68%
- Evaluating Language Model Character Traitsin corpus2024≈ 68%
- ≈ 68%
Similar preprints — Semantic Scholar
Cited by (5)
- Steering at the Source: Style Modulation Heads for Robust Persona Control
Residual-stream activation steering reliably degrades text coherency when steering vectors push models toward out-of-distribution behavior, and this collapse goes undetected by standard benchmarks: MM
- Endogenous Resistance to Activation Steering in Language Models
- Quantitative Introspection in Language Models: Tracking Emotive States Across Conversation
Quantitative introspection—the causal coupling between an instruction-tuned LLM's numeric self-report and a probe-defined internal emotive direction—is demonstrably present in models as small as LLaMA
- Mechanistic Interpretability of EEG Foundation Models via Sparse Autoencoders
Applying TopK Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to three architecturally distinct EEG foundation models — SleepFM, REVE, and LaBraM — reveals that clinical concepts are not cleanly separable in these models'
- Manifold Steering Reveals the Shared Geometry of Neural Network Representation and Behavior
Manifold steering — intervening on model activations along paths constrained to lie on a learned activation manifold M_h rather than along Euclidean linear directions — produces behavioral trajectorie