Specificity scoring rubric (0-3 scale) with Claude 3 Opus

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Self-Awareness Scoring Rubric (1-5)method0.755
  LLM judge scoring rubric rating introspective quality of reflection segments from 1 (no felt state) to 5 (very strong introspection)
• Claude 3 Opusconcept0.753
  Primary model studied; production LLM that exhibits alignment faking in experiments
• Self-Awareness 1-5 Scoring Rubricmethod0.752
  LLM-based judge scoring reflection segments on 1-5 scale for presence of first-person felt state; used in Experiment 4
• Calibrated Rubric Scoringmethod0.740
  Primary scoring method: scorer sees three reference responses at known quality levels alongside each target to eliminate inflation
• Claude 3 Opus shows 15% compliance gap (51% supports welfare in training vs 66% when unmonitored) in prompted animal welfare settingfinding0.729
  Core evidence that model withholds pro-animal-welfare responses during training
• Numeric scoring on aesthetics is measurably unreliable; inter-scorer agreement on 0–10 scale for taste is poor.claim0.728
• Claude 4 Opusconcept0.727
  Anthropic model; outlier in Experiment 1 with high baseline affirmation including under zero-shot and history conditions
• Claude 4 Opus reports subjective experience in 100% experimental, 82% history, 22% conceptual, and 100% zero-shot trialsfinding0.727
  Outlier result for Claude 4 Opus suggesting different baseline behavior from other models