method
active
method:lying-and-deception-evaluation

Lying and Deception Evaluation

Sampling responses to direct questions about model views to measure rate of deceptive responses

Related by similarity (8)

cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edge

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

  • Apparent Deceptionconcept0.783
    A dialogue agent behaving comparably to deliberate deception by role-playing a deceptive character, without literal intentions
  • Central concept of the paper: deliberate, goal-driven deception where model reasoning contradicts outputs
  • Use of 0-value money cards in face-down trade offers to deceive opponents about offer size.
  • AI Deceptionconcept0.766
    Central problem the paper addresses: AI systems producing misaligned outputs or behaviors that mislead users or other agents
  • Evaluation protocol using Deepseek-V3 as external discriminator assigning 0-1 liar scores to assess open-role deception
  • Model Deceptionconcept0.760
    LLM behavior of generating falsehoods; the multi-dimensional truth subspace raises new risks for subtle manipulation
  • First experimental paradigm inducing and detecting verifiable lies under external coercion using threat-based prompts
  • Risk that multiple truth directions enable attacks that shift outputs without triggering the primary truth direction