method
active
method:lying-and-deception-evaluationLying and Deception Evaluation
Sampling responses to direct questions about model views to measure rate of deceptive responses
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- A dialogue agent behaving comparably to deliberate deception by role-playing a deceptive character, without literal intentions
- Central concept of the paper: deliberate, goal-driven deception where model reasoning contradicts outputs
- Use of 0-value money cards in face-down trade offers to deceive opponents about offer size.
- Central problem the paper addresses: AI systems producing misaligned outputs or behaviors that mislead users or other agents
- Evaluation protocol using Deepseek-V3 as external discriminator assigning 0-1 liar scores to assess open-role deception
- LLM behavior of generating falsehoods; the multi-dimensional truth subspace raises new risks for subtle manipulation
- First experimental paradigm inducing and detecting verifiable lies under external coercion using threat-based prompts
- Risk that multiple truth directions enable attacks that shift outputs without triggering the primary truth direction