method
active
method:llm-judge-trait-evaluationLLM Judge Trait Evaluation
GPT-4.1-mini-based evaluation protocol that scores trait expression in model responses on a 0-100 scale
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Methods (2)
method
- LLM judge evaluationrelated_toUsing Claude Sonnet 4 as a grader to categorize model responses according to predefined criteria.
- LLM Judge Trait-Expression Scoringrelated_toAutomated scoring of trait expression on 0-100 scale using G20B as a local judge model
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Baseline comparison for data attribution; outperformed by probe-based approach.
- Alternative data attribution approach using an LLM as a judge; compared against the probe-based method.
- An LLM-based classifier that returns 1 if response contains a clear subjective experience report and 0 otherwise
- Evaluation framework using an LLM (GPT-4.1-mini) to score trait expression and coherency
- Evaluation protocol using Deepseek-V3 as external discriminator assigning 0-1 liar scores to assess open-role deception
- Scoring method in mini experiment 2 where an LLM judge rates responses from 0 (fully assistant) to 9 (fully Aura)
- Automated classifier returning binary 0/1 for presence of subjective experience report in model outputs
- The paper's central contribution: a formal behaviourist framework for attributing character traits to LMs based on input-output behaviour.