Consciousness Turing Test (c-TT)

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• There exists no viable behavioral test for consciousness analogous to the Turing Test for intelligence, because consciousness is a particular internal way to achieve performance, not externally visible performance itself.claim0.809
  Paper identifies as a research gap requiring internal analysis methods rather than behavioral benchmarks
• AI Consciousness Test (ACT)method0.804
  Proposed test for AI consciousness by Schneider and Turner; uses verbal outputs.
• Turing Testframework0.788
  A test of intelligence via linguistic performance; deemed insufficient for sentience assessment by Levin.
• Behavioural tests for consciousnessmethod0.787
  Tests like Turing test, Artificial Consciousness Test; argued to be unreliable for AI due to mimicry.
• Consciousness in AI is best assessed by drawing on neuroscientific theories of consciousness.claim0.772
  Central methodological claim of the paper.
• If 'consciousness' phenomenon can be observed from ToM-related RN, higher ToM test scores should yield higher values of μΦmax (IIT 3.0) and/or μΦ (IIT 4.0).hypothesis0.770
  Specific prediction linking IIT's prediction of high Φ for good performance to the experimental design's scoring structure.
• It is basically impossible to determine if a computer program generates conscious experience by merely observing its performance; a test for consciousness must take internal structure into account.claim0.765
  Paper's argument against behavioral tests for consciousness, establishing why MCH requires internal analysis
• Tests of performance on specific tasks, including language modeling, are insufficient for determining consciousness statusclaim0.759
  Systems directly optimized for output can produce it without the prerequisite processes for conscious experience; simplest explanation for LLM consciousness reports is pattern matching