hypothesis
active
hypothesis:the-relationship-between-mind-and-body-is-the-same-as-the-relationship-between-causally-instructive-mathematical-facts-and-physicsThe relationship between mind and body is the same as the relationship between causally instructive mathematical facts and physics
Second core numbered hypothesis in the abstract; central analogy of the paper.
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Michael Levin
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Claims (1)
claim
- Supports treating Platonic patterns as genuinely causal rather than epiphenomenal descriptions.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Proposition 2, guarding against conflating analogy with identity.
- Calls for consilience across disciplines.
- Core claim distinguishing this paper's contribution from looser representational similarity arguments.
- What is the relationship or overlap between the sets demarcated by ‘life’ and ‘cognition’?question0.785Probes the boundary between life and mind.