hypothesis
active
hypothesis:if-the-post-cartesian-method-is-as-powerful-as-claimed-it-may-one-day-seem-comparable-in-value-to-the-cartesian-first-method-and-complementary-to-itIf the post-Cartesian method is as powerful as claimed, it may one day seem comparable in value to the Cartesian first method and complementary to it
Alexander's prospective claim about the long-term scientific significance of the second method
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Frameworks (1)
framework
- The core framework introduced in this chapter: using the observer's experienced inner wholeness as an objective measuring instrument for the degree of life in external systems
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Alexander's reconciliation: Cartesian method for machine-like phenomena, wholeness method for relative wholeness judgments
- Alexander claims his method is a genuine alternative to Cartesian observation.
- Alexander's proposed alternative: wholeness of the world and feeling of happiness together form a single unity
- Alexander's critique of Cartesian epistemology as structurally incapable of perceiving living structure
- Characteristic of a structure-preserving process.
- Alexander's visionary speculation about the ultimate reach of the post-Cartesian observational program
- The scientific method that requires observation by any observer and excludes subjective states, argued to be inadequate for measuring life.
- Advantage over GradNorm.