hypothesis
active
hypothesis:if-persistence-is-genuinely-related-to-emotion-features-lower-pcs-of-the-emotion-space-more-central-less-noisy-should-be-more-persistent-if-it-is-an-artifact-noisier-pcs-should-have-similar-persistenceIf persistence is genuinely related to emotion features, lower PCs of the emotion space (more central, less noisy) should be more persistent; if it is an artifact, noisier PCs should have similar persistence.
Falsifiability test built into the PC analysis design
Source paper
extracted_fromScott Sauers · Imago · Janus · Antra Tessera
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Findings (1)
finding
- Lower (more central) PCs of emotion feature activations are more persistent than higher-rank (noisier) PCs in both Kimi and Cogito, above variance-matched baselines.associated_withsupportsSupports that persistence is genuinely tied to emotion structure rather than measurement artifact
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Rules out measurement artifact explanation for the persistence finding
- Analysis showing that lower-rank (more central) PCs of emotion feature activations are more persistent than higher-rank (noisier) PCs
- Lower (more central) emotion PCs are more persistent than higher (noisier) PCs in both Kimi and Cogitofinding0.854Rules out that persistence is an artifact of probe construction, since noise dimensions are not similarly persistent
- Acknowledged alternative explanation that the paper does not rule out
- Core unresolved confound the paper acknowledges but cannot rule out
- Core open question the paper raises but does not fully resolve
- The phenomenon that emotion feature activations remain elevated above baseline beyond local token bursts, measurable as long-range correlation
- Core empirical claim distinguishing emotion persistence from generic high-variance probe persistence