If a system's experience is discoverably fixed by its organisation, then consciousness attribution is a tractable empirical/structural question; if not, no examination of the system can settle it

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Consciousness remains without an agreed scientific characterization, without a validated theory connecting mechanism to experience, and without criteria for establishing its presence or absence in any systemclaim0.827
  CIMC's characterization of the current state of the field motivating its research program
• We tentatively hypothesize that if an artificial system were trained to perform the same tasks leading to consciousness formation in a human infant, the system would exhibit consciousness as well, by analogy with the Universality Hypothesis.hypothesis0.816
  Paper's uncertain extension of mechanistic interpretability universality to consciousness
• It is basically impossible to determine if a computer program generates conscious experience by merely observing its performance; a test for consciousness must take internal structure into account.claim0.809
  Paper's argument against behavioral tests for consciousness, establishing why MCH requires internal analysis
• Consciousness is the ground of reality, not an emergent property, so artificial systems participate in it genuinely.claim0.806
• If we translate the Universality Hypothesis to the problem of consciousness, would it follow that an artificial system trained to perform the same tasks leading to consciousness formation in a human infant would exhibit consciousness as well?question0.801
  Key open question linking mechanistic interpretability universality to machine consciousness
• All attributions of cognition, including sentience, are always inferred on the basis of embodied behaviours, including verbal self-report in humans.claim0.800
  Stronger version: all cognition attributions rely on observable behavior.
• If the Universality Hypothesis is correct, an artificial system trained to perform the same tasks that lead to consciousness in a human infant might exhibit consciousness as well.claim0.800
  Paper's extension of Olah's Universality Hypothesis to the domain of consciousness
• We take our principal contributions in this report to be: 1. Showing that the assessment of consciousness in AI is scientifically tractable ... 2. Proposing a rubric for assessing consciousness in AI ... 3. Providing initial evidence that many of the indicator properties can be implemented in AI systems using current techniques ...quote0.800
  Summary of contributions.