hypothesis
active
hypothesis:concept-cone-truth-interventions-would-generalize-to-larger-frontier-models-and-multimodal-settingsConcept cone truth interventions would generalize to larger frontier models and multimodal settings
Key robustness question raised as future work
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Kevin Shengyang Yu · Vaidehi Bulusu · Oscar Yasunaga · Lau, Clayton +4
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Questions (1)
question
- Open question on generalization beyond Gemma and Qwen families
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Interpretation of ASR degradation patterns by model size across cone dimensions
- Future direction hypothesis for giving semantic meaning to individual axes
- Mechanistic interpretation of how activation steering induces deception through the model's reasoning process
- Overarching conclusion summarizing the paper's contribution relative to prior universality claims.
- Can concept steering interventions on EEG foundation models be made selective rather than globally destructive?question0.751Research question motivating the introduction of the probe area metric and identification of operational regimes
- Final token position consistently yields the strongest truth interventions across modelsfinding0.751Experiment 1 finding on token position, consistent with prior work
- Call to extend the inference of sentience to non-biological systems as well.
- Concept cone methodology failed to produce a meaningful cone for sentiment on Stanford Sentiment Treebankfinding0.745Negative result from sentiment extension showing concept cones do not trivially generalize