hypothesis
active
hypothesis:base-models-assign-higher-likelihood-to-typical-set-representative-sequences-than-to-degenerate-sequences-under-vs-promptsBase models assign higher likelihood to typical-set (representative) sequences than to degenerate sequences under VS prompts
Assumption D.6 formalized in the theoretical framework; empirically validated with coin-flip typicality rating experiments
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Jiayi Zhang · Simon C.H. Yu · Derek Chong · Anthony Sicilia +3
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Shows typicality bias is preserved through instruction tuning and RLHF, not introduced by alignment
- Supported by empirical comparison showing VS achieves KL divergence of 0.12 from pretraining distribution vs. 14.89 for direct prompting
- Observed by Anima Labs in untrained base models; not present in training data, implying computational origin of self-reported parallel processing.
- Claim that capability emerges from architecture, not data, and that later models lose the surprise.
- Observation about asymmetry in base model capabilities.
- Assumption D.3 formalized in the theoretical framework; empirically validated with coin-flip sequence experiments
- The model tends to reflect more when the question is difficult, and accuracy is generally lower for harder questionshypothesis0.763Hypothesis explaining negative correlation between reflection rate and accuracy without implying reflection is harmful
- The theoretical mechanism explaining why VS works despite mode collapse remaining operative