framework
active
framework:local-vs-compositional-representationsLocal vs Compositional Representations
Theoretical distinction between representing token-context pairs as individual features (local) vs combining independent features (compositional)
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Concepts (1)
concept
- Token-in-Context Featureassociated_withFeature that fires on a specific token only within a specific surrounding context (e.g., 'the' in physics vs 'the' in mathematics)
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Prior assumption that high-level variables align with disjoint groups of neurons in standard basis; contrasted with distributed representations.
- The idea that features are encoded as directions in activation space.
- The central question of whether representational geometry implies corresponding computational structure
- Representations of one's own mental states; associated with consciousness in higher-order theories.
- How do representations differ or converge between architectures, tasks, and modalities?question0.730Broader research question MAS is positioned to address, citing multiple recent works.
- Modular reasoning enabled by monoid and other algebraic laws; central to maintainability and correctness of functional systems.
- Primary guiding question for the paper; explores multiple formulations and uses of the term.
- Hierarchical representations in neural networks that allow compression and coordinated behaviour while retaining sensitivity to input changes.