Crump et al. Eight Criteria Framework

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Quantitative criteria like those of Crump et al. are a good example of the kind of framework we need: explicitly laying out conditions in a way that reveals their value and limitations.claim0.859
  Praise for the target framework's transparency.
• Crump et al. eight criteria for sentiencemethod0.842
  Set of eight criteria: nociception, sensory integration, integrated nociception, analgesia, motivational trade-offs, flexible self-protection, associative learning, analgesia preference.
• Crump Et Als Eight Criteria For Sentienceframework0.820
• Eight Sentience Criteria (Crump et al.)framework0.811
  Quantitative, flexible framework for assessing sentience: nociception, sensory integration, analgesia, trade-offs, self-protection, learning, preference.
• Crump Et Al Sentience Criteriaframework0.795
• Crump et al. Decapod Sentience Frameworkframework0.771
  A set of eight criteria for assessing sentience in decapod crustaceans, proposed by Crump et al. (2022).
• Crump et al. (2022) offer a well-argued example of an essential development: a rigorous framework for assessing sentience from the perspective of moral concern over an agent's welfare.claim0.769
  Levin's endorsement of the target paper's contribution.
• Most of Crump et al.'s other criteria are met by non-neural morphogenetic agents via a simple pivot of terms to 'electrically active cell'.claim0.745
  Generalization of the criteria beyond neurons.