Conceptual Mapping Between Behavioral Cognition And Anatomical Regulation

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Conceptual Mapping Between Behavioral And Morphogenetic Cognitionframework0.843
• There is a bidirectional relationship between the geometry of representation and behavior across tasks and modalities.claim0.744
  Author’s interpretive claim that the shared geometry is general and robust.
• Where Do The Anatomical And Behavioral Goals Ofquestion0.738
• The analogous circular structure between representation manifold and behavior manifold is downstream of training data and its implicit cyclic conceptual structure.claim0.735
  The paper's causal explanation for why representation and behavior geometry both appear circular for days of the week.
• There exists a bidirectional relationship between the geometry of neural representation and the geometry of model behaviorclaim0.734
  Central empirical claim of the paper, demonstrated across tasks and modalities
• The conceptual distinctions between mind and body are artificial, and developmental biology and behavioral science should be unified.claim0.731
  Calls for consilience across disciplines.
• Integration and collective action (basal cognition) mechanisms enact the functional relationships necessary for new individuality.hypothesis0.730
  Proposes biological mechanisms implementing non-decomposable functions in developmental individuality.
• There is a many-to-many mapping between neurons and concepts, meaning multiple high-level causal variables might be encoded in overlapping groups of neuronsclaim0.728
  Fundamental theoretical claim motivating DAS, attributed to Smolensky/Rumelhart/McClelland.