framework
active
framework:buddhist-and-indic-conceptions-of-no-selfBuddhist and Indic conceptions of no-Self
Eastern philosophical tradition proposing non-duality between Self and world; parallel solution to persistence paradox alongside Process Philosophy.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Claims (1)
claim
- Levin proposes viewing the Self not as illusion but as a compact model created and maintained by agents; captures the fact that thought forms survive through architectural reinterpretation.
Frameworks (2)
framework
- Buddhist and Indic no-Selfrelated_tosame_asEastern perspective on non-duality of Self and world.
Questions (1)
question
- The persistence paradoxanswered_byCore logical puzzle: if an agent does not change, it dies; if it changes, the self ceases to exist. Applies to all scales from organelles to evolutionary lineages.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Core Buddhist doctrine that selfhood is illusory, constructed from impermanent causal factors, providing philosophical foundation for the entire inquiry.
- Author assertion: rejection of singular self enables perception of distributed/dynamic selfhood; foundation for affordance augmentation hypothesis.
- Buddhist doctrine that there is no permanent, independent self; only a stream of aggregates.
- Acknowledges precursors in non‑Western traditions.
- Eastern Buddhist and Indic conception offering parallel solution to Persistence Paradox; non-duality of Self vs. world.
- Buddhist doctrine that there is no permanent self; grounds non-duality in AI alignment by eliminating adversarial self-preservation