X → X[′′] on G and M are closure operators satisfying extensivity, idempotence, and monotonicity.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Enlightenment is not Dkl(P‖Q)=0 but the release of identification with Q itself, recognizing the model as a model.claim0.755
  Proposition 4.3, information-geometric elucidation of enlightenment as release rather than optimization.
• The specification for (⊸) is a category homomorphism (µ id = id, µ(g ∘ f) = µg ∘ µf), leading to a correct-by-construction implementation.claim0.748
  Demonstration on linear transformations.
• µ is an applicative homomorphism: µ(pure a) = pure a and µ(imf <*> imx) = µ imf <*> µ imx.claim0.742
  Result for Image applicative specification.
• overcomes statelessness in a very meaningful sense and provides a very nice mechanism for introspection (specifically of computations at earlier token positions).quote0.734
  Quote framing KV caching as introspection mechanism.
• Newtonian mechanics augmented by statistical mechanics cannot explain chemical bond stability or genetic persistence; quantum mechanics is necessary.claim0.733
• Enlightenment is the transition to a state in which identification with the ego-centric coordinate system φp0 is dissolved, enabling direct description of the intrinsic geometry of (M,g).claim0.732
  Proposition 4.4, differential-geometric elucidation of enlightenment.
• Curiosity, insight, decision-making, and diverse phenomena can all be accommodated by a single imperative: minimization of expected free energy (resolution of uncertainty).claim0.730
  Central thesis of the paper unifying cognitive phenomena under one objective function
• The results generalise readily to non-equilibrium systems where scaling relationships remain similar (e.g., dynamic or localised scaling).claim0.729
  Claim about broader applicability of the scaling argument