finding
active
finding:vs-standard-achieves-kl-divergence-of-0-027-from-uniform-distribution-on-dice-roll-simulation-vs-0-926-for-direct-promptingVS-Standard achieves KL divergence of 0.027 from uniform distribution on dice roll simulation, vs. 0.926 for Direct prompting
Shows VS enables LLMs to better approximate random behavior compared to direct prompting
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Jiayi Zhang · Simon C.H. Yu · Derek Chong · Anthony Sicilia +3
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Strong empirical evidence that VS recovers pretraining distribution while direct prompting collapses
- Shows VS substantially better approximates the pretraining distribution than baseline methods
- Human study confirming automatic diversity metrics align with human perceptions
- Best VS result in synthetic data generation for math, demonstrating downstream improvement through diversity
- Cost-diversity trade-off analysis showing VS's practical efficiency
- Practical utility of reducing divergence demonstrated through regression analysis
- Quantifies how much of the base model's diversity VS can recover compared to baseline prompting
- Core empirical result validating the three-level reflection framework on code reasoning.