TrackerAgent win rate=53.6%

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• TrackerAgent win rate 53.6% in 98 canonical gamesfinding0.881
  TrackerAgent won over half of the combined-comp1 games.
• TrackerAgent TrueSkill μ=28.7 ± 3.6, 53.6% win ratefinding0.852
  Best code agent outperforming six of seven LLMs.
• TrackerAgent buy-right percentage 34.4%finding0.793
  TrackerAgent has the highest buy-right rate among all agents.
• TrackerAgent outperforms six of seven tested LLMsfinding0.787
  In the 98-game slice, TrackerAgent had a higher win rate or TrueSkill than all LLMs except Gemini 3 Flash.
• Sonnet 4.5 win rate=35.7% (n=14)finding0.754
  Sonnet's win rate in exploratory games
• Two heuristic code agents (TrackerAgent and SetRaceAgent) outperform most tested LLMs.claim0.742
  Calibration that conditional logic can beat cost-efficient LLMs in this setting.
• TrackerAgent and SetRaceAgent have TC tightness τ ≈ 0.2–0.25, looser countersfinding0.738
  Code agents trade bargaining precision for acquisition pressure.
• TrackerAgentmethod0.725
  deterministic code agent that maintains perfect information from observable events and makes greedy decisions conditioned on card counts and estimated wealth