finding
active
finding:sycophantic-random-and-shuffled-controls-go-negative-at-8-of-10-cells-while-real-vector-lifts-to-42-5Sycophantic random and shuffled controls go negative at 8 of 10 cells while real vector lifts to +42.5
Particularly strong negative control result for Sycophantic persona
Source paper
extracted_from(2026) · Viktor Moskvoretskii · Dominik Glandorf · Jorge Medina Moreira · Tanja Käser +1
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Validates that steering effects are persona-specific rather than generic perturbation artifacts
- Controls for probe artifacts; demonstrates self-reports carry information specifically about probe-defined concept directions
- Contrasts with temporal permutation where Span Representation dominates; suggests spatio permutation reveals different dynamics.
- SAE analysis shows sycophancy is primarily stylistic rather than content-based
- Steering Vector Control maintains low unexpected rate of 0.08 in Experiment 1, comparable to baselinefinding0.726Shows that inducing deception via steering vectors preserves semantic coherence and does not cause random errors
- Sycophantic steering delta of +42.46 (p<0.001) at stage1-step99000 (415B tokens) in OLMo-3finding0.723Peak same-checkpoint sycophantic steering result in OLMo-3 pretraining
- Replication of prosocial paradox on reasoning model
- Validates robustness of universal lift finding