finding
active
finding:steering-vector-constructed-from-all-16-contrastive-pairs-outperforms-most-single-pair-vectors-best-4-pair-vector-outperforms-full-16-pair-vectorSteering vector constructed from all 16 contrastive pairs outperforms most single-pair vectors; best 4-pair vector outperforms full 16-pair vector
Demonstrates averaging multiple prompt pairs reduces noise; optimal subset selection further improves performance.
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Hua, Tim Tian · Qin, Andrew · Marks, Samuel · Nanda, Neel
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Four best contrastive prompt pairs outperform full 16-pair average steering vector for type hint suppressionfinding0.881Optimization result for steering vector construction.
- Method for computing steering vectors as mean activation differences between reflection levels at a given layer.
- Validates that steering vectors capture reflection semantics by finding tokens reported in related work.
- Observation from 100% accuracy on specific concept-layer-strength combinations suggesting concept-specific detectability
- Supported by the instruction discovery experiments comparing steering vs. embedding baselines.
- Demonstrates distributed steering is more effective and less accuracy-damaging than concentrated steering.
- Practical finding for optimizing steering setup.
- Core applied contribution claim, supported by top-k accuracy comparisons.