finding
active
finding:robustness-drop-and-coherence-loss-are-negatively-correlated-r-0-56-and-capture-distinct-facets-of-emergent-misalignmentRobustness drop and coherence loss are negatively correlated (r=0.56) and capture distinct facets of emergent misalignment
DeepSeek has large coherence loss but no robustness excess; GPT-4o has little coherence loss but large robustness drop
Source paper
extracted_from(2026) · Davi Bastos Costa · Renato Vicente
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Quantitative result showing weaker relationship between accuracy and contra-positive coherence.
- Motivates adopting coherency score as the primary evaluation metric
- Dataset mixture experiments establish the fraction of incorrect data needed to induce misalignment
- Human data fine-tuning effect is distinct from synthetic emergent misalignment and likely caused by off-policy training
- Concurrent work result showing emergent misalignment occurs in small models
- Mechanistic explanation of why fine-tuning shifts persona vectors rather than directly learning narrow behaviors
- Example from Hoel et al. (2013) replicated in the survey.
- We hypothesize that coherency degradation stems from residual stream intervention that indiscriminately amplifies off-target noisehypothesis0.760Core mechanistic hypothesis motivating the shift from residual stream to head-level steering