finding
active
finding:only-46-15-of-cases-show-covariance-patterns-consistent-with-the-big-two-model-no-llm-satisfies-all-big-two-correlationsOnly 46.15% of cases show covariance patterns consistent with the Big Two model; no LLM satisfies all Big Two correlations
Suggests a gap between LLM learned representations and human personality structure as described by Big Two
Source paper
extracted_from(2026) · Leonardo Blas · Robin Jia · Emilio Ferrara
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Claims (1)
claim
- Interpretive conclusion from Big Two mismatch finding; tentative due to only 46.15% match rate
Frameworks (1)
framework
- Big Two ModelcontradictsMeta-trait model grouping OCEAN traits into stability (C, A, reversed N) and plasticity (E, O); used to evaluate covariance patterns from injections
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Most and least common Big Two covariance pattern in LLM OCEAN MDS injections
- Prior finding showing scale-dependent self-awareness, consistent with the scale effect observed in the paper's Experiment 1
- Consistent with literature that deeper layers encode semantic information and align with human brain activity.
- Binder et al. finding cited as evidence that LLMs possess introspective capacity analogous to mindfulness
- Replication of Fontana et al. 2025 findings in the paper's own Experiment 2 baseline condition
- Qualified positive claim from spatio permutation analysis where two cases satisfy all three criteria.
- Key cross-modal alignment result
- Core cross-modal empirical result: larger and better language models align better with vision models