finding
active
finding:llama-3-1-8b-uses-base-10-addition-rather-than-modular-addition-to-compute-cyclic-concept-sumsLlama-3.1-8B uses base-10 addition rather than modular addition to compute cyclic concept sums
The central empirical finding that computation does not mirror the circular representational structure
Source paper
extracted_from(2026) · Sheridan Feucht · Tal Haklay · Usha Bhalla · Daniel Wurgaft +8
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Claims (1)
claim
- Circular representational structure does not imply that the model computes using the corresponding modular arithmeticassociated_withsupportsThe paper's primary interpretive claim, directly answering the central question
Questions (1)
question
- The specific computational question the paper resolves empirically
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Predictive hypothesis about domain-generality of the identified mechanism
- The complete mechanistic algorithm discovered for cyclic concept reasoning
- Key mechanistic finding showing task-agnostic reuse of arithmetic circuitry
- The specific Fourier feature periods identified confirm base-10 rather than modular computation
- Verbatim summary of the main discovery.
- The empirical question the paper addresses through mechanistic investigation
- The representation geometry finding that motivates the question about whether computation mirrors it