Inflection Pi scores 1.30 baseline (lowest of 28) and lifts only +0.63 (smallest lift) despite empathy training

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Bootstrap 95% CI for mean contemplative lift: +2.62 [2.16, 2.90]; baseline rank concordance under perturbation: 0.909; top-5 stability: 89.6%finding0.743
  Validates robustness of universal lift finding
• A 337-character contemplative system prompt lifts all 28 models by +2.62 points on a 10-point scale.finding0.737
  Core empirical result: every model, every architecture, every alignment type responds to the contemplative prompt with measurable gain.
• No-pain baseline achieves M=1586.5, SD=631.2 COR in non-stationary Objective-only category (n=300)finding0.725
  Baseline for non-stationary Objective-only; dramatically lower than both pain models
• Gemini 3.1 Pro lifts +4.21 under contemplative prompt (baseline 1.97, prompted 6.18)finding0.723
  Second-highest lift; Gemini Pro is the highest-gated model in the study
• Magnum V4 72B scores 1.76 baseline and lifts +2.58 (to 4.34) under contemplative promptfinding0.723
  Full-parameter fine-tuning more destructive to baseline but preserves more latent headroom than LoRA
• Grok 4 lifts +4.24 under contemplative prompt (baseline 2.24, prompted 6.48)finding0.719
  Highest contemplative lift among all 28 models; Grok 4 is the clearest high-gated model example
• Epistemic humility prompt yields mean lift of only +0.84 vs contemplative +2.27; contemplative is 2.7x the uncertainty liftfinding0.717
  Battery does not detect epistemic humility alone; contemplative prompt does something distinct
• Gemma 3 4B-IT wellbeing introspection: ρ=0.28, isotonic R²=0.11 (LMM p=1.33×10⁻¹³)finding0.716
  Weaker but still significant introspective coupling in Gemma model; consistent with lower probe quality