Gemma 3 4B wellbeing probe: peak Cohen's d=1.8

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Qwen 2.5 7B wellbeing probe: peak Cohen's d=3.5finding0.887
  Strongest cross-family probe; explains clearer introspection in Qwen than Gemma
• Wellbeing probe: peak Cohen's d=3.34 (layer 16), p=7.21×10⁻¹³ in LLaMA-3.2-3Bfinding0.880
  Probe validation result confirming wellbeing direction captures meaningful structure
• Impulsivity probe: peak Cohen's d=3.60 (layer 13), p=3.58×10⁻¹³ in LLaMA-3.2-3Bfinding0.817
  Strongest probe validation result; highest Cohen's d among the four concepts
• Interest probe: peak Cohen's d=1.67 (layer 14), p=9.45×10⁻⁶ in LLaMA-3.2-3Bfinding0.815
  Probe validation result confirming interest direction captures meaningful structure
• Wellbeing probe drift is positive in Gemma (ρ=0.34 pooled turn-correlation) and Qwen (ρ=0.24); both p<10⁻⁵finding0.797
  Normalized probe-score drift across turns generalizes beyond LLaMA family
• Gemma-3-4B-it shows three-stage layer trajectory and S(ℓ) peak despite scale differences in dr and ρdfinding0.772
  E3 backbone generalization finding for Gemma; validates pattern across diverse architectures
• gemma-3-1b-it yields only one valid MDS injection score (phi_1,A,up = 4.8) and is excluded from main analysesfinding0.758
  Identified exception to overall MDS effectiveness; reason remains unexplained as a limitation
• Gemma-2-27B-it deceptive response rate reduced from 100% to 9.36% ± 7.09% after SOO fine-tuningfinding0.753
  Primary result showing SOO fine-tuning significantly reduces deception in Gemma-2-27B