finding
active
finding:g3-f-completion-tokens-1-500-per-call-g3-1-fl-80-per-callG3-F completion tokens ~1,500 per call, G3.1-FL ~80 per call
verbose reasoning not required for strong play
Source paper
extracted_from(2026) · Robert Müller · Clemens Müller
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Very efficient token usage with strong play.
- Token usage varies roughly 20× across models, from ~14,800 (G3.1-FL) to ~275,000 (G3-F) per gamefinding0.823Reasoning verbosity does not predict strategic strength: both top and weak models span a wide range of token usage.
- Second-best LLM, competitive with TrackerAgent.
- Gemini 3 Flash never overbid
- G3-F TrueSkill μ=30.1 ± 3.3, 72.9% wins, median score 5,250 on combined-comp1 slice (n=98 canonical games)finding0.739Top LLM performance with high win rate and large score.
- sophisticated bluff calibration
- high variance in scores due to multiplicative scoring sensitivity
- High buy-right usage among LLMs.