finding
active
finding:claude-achieves-significantly-higher-spearman-correlation-predicting-feature-activations-vs-neuron-activationsClaude achieves significantly higher Spearman correlation predicting feature activations vs neuron activations
Automated interpretability analysis of activations confirms features are more interpretable than neurons
Source paper
extracted_from(2024) · Marc Carauleanu · Michael Vaiana · Judd Rosenblatt · Cameron Berg +1
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Claims (1)
claim
- Central claim of the paper, supported by detailed feature analysis, human evaluation, automated interpretability of activations, and automated interpretability of logit weights
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Systematic comparison showing features are substantially more universal than neurons across models
- Shows base64 feature is polysemantic at neuron level but monosemantic as learned feature
- Validates robustness of alignment metric choice
- Counter-example disproving that architectural sparsity alone can prevent polysemanticity
- SAE features are not simply mirroring individual neurons.
- Demonstrates that activation similarity can diverge from logit weight similarity due to interference
- Comparative prediction motivating future work contrasting different approaches to LLM self-knowledge
- Predicted neural signature of insight: reduced ERP latency and increased early amplitude