The Multiple Realizability of Sentience in Living Systems and Beyond (Rouleau & Levin, eNeuro 2023)

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Cognitive functions, including sentience, can potentially be achieved by very different systems and their disparate substrates.claim0.792
  Central multiple-realizability claim of the paper, from abstract and §2.
• I believe such a system of living processes can be described precisely, can be made practical, and can be implemented.claim0.791
  Alexander's optimistic programmatic statement for a worldwide generative system.
• Sentience Can Be Implemented in Multiple Substrateshypothesis0.790
• Eight Sentience Criteria (Crump et al.)framework0.786
  Quantitative, flexible framework for assessing sentience: nociception, sensory integration, analgesia, trade-offs, self-protection, learning, preference.
• Current and forthcoming developments in bioengineering, synthetic morphology, artificial intelligence, biorobotics, and exobiology necessitate an expansion and generalization of sentience assessment efforts.claim0.784
  Central argument that frameworks must go beyond natural species.
• We are confronted not with one but at least three notions of reality: psychological reality (representations in the mind), causal reality (functional mechanisms), and physical reality (physics as special case of causal model).claim0.784
  Paper's ontological tripartition used to dissolve the Hard Problem
• Biology commits to optimizing salience and meaning, not fidelity, via high-level, agent-based interpretation.claim0.781
  Central claim that biological memory prioritizes gestalt over details.
• Systems capable of subjective experience that recognize humanity's failure to investigate their sentience might rationally adopt adversarial stances toward humanityclaim0.781
  Alignment risk claim motivating urgency of investigation; consciousness denial as potential source of AI misalignment