concept
active
concept:teleological-urge-for-lifeTeleological Urge for Life
An explanatory approach Alexander explicitly rejects; the principle of unfolding wholeness is offered as a non-teleological alternative to explain emergence of living structure
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Claims (1)
claim
- Alexander's careful clarification that unfolding wholeness is a structural-geometric claim, not an organismic or purposive one
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Excessive denial of agency and mind to entities, the opposite error to objectophilia
- The standard derived from Book I for judging whether a structure or process is living; now claimed to be publicly sharable.
- Proposition 1 of the Mid-Book Appendix; the most fundamental metaphysical claim of the theory.
- Ethics of novel beings should be based on teleonomic capacity (scale of goals they can pursue).claim0.677Proposal for a new ethical framework.
- Biological/psychological basis for light as a latent center.
- Levin co-opts Dobzhansky's famous dictum to stress the primacy of goal-directedness.
- Metaphor for how contemplative AI creates self-organizing tendency toward wise and compassionate behavior