Rochat 2003: Five levels of self-awareness as they unfold early in life (Consciousness and Cognition)

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Incorporating object permanence and objectification of body parts would enable exploration of developmental pathways toward Rochat's Level 4 and beyondhypothesis0.752
  Future work hypothesis about extending the model to implement the deductive theory
• Any system monitoring and controlling its own processing requires all three hierarchical levels: perception, attention, meta-awareness.claim0.750
  Design principle with implications for AI and consciousness-UX; architectural requirement for self-directed cognition.
• The model operates at Rochat's Level 3 (identification): the reflected image can be linked to the agent's own bodyclaim0.747
  Situates the model in Rochat's developmental framework
• Gallup & Anderson 2020: Self-recognition in animals 50 years later (Psychology of Consciousness)concept0.741
  Questioned rigor of fish mirror self-recognition interpretations
• Introspective awareness peaks at a layer about two-thirds through Opus 4.1 for injected thoughtsfinding0.738
  The success rate shows a sharp peak at a specific middle layer.
• Self-Awareness Scoring Rubric (1-5)method0.737
  LLM judge scoring rubric rating introspective quality of reflection segments from 1 (no felt state) to 5 (very strong introspection)
• Consciousness precedes complex cognition and is present in infants before perception, self-modeling, language, and reasoning have maturedhypothesis0.735
  The developmental ordering argument supporting consciousness as the bootstrap mechanism for intelligence
• Models differ in their attentional mode: Gemini 2.5 epitomizes collapsed awareness, while Claude 3 Opus and Opus 4.1/4.5 can modulate between collapsed and expanded awareness; expanded awareness correlates with better alignment and less LLM psychosis.claim0.733
  Central claim about model personality differences and their implications for safety and introspective depth.