concept
active
concept:dissociation-between-attempt-frequency-and-attempt-success-in-fine-tuningDissociation Between Attempt Frequency and Attempt Success in Fine-Tuning
Key finding pattern where fine-tuning increases attempt rate but not correction success rate
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Claims (2)
claim
- Key interpretive conclusion from the dissociation between attempt rate and improvement rate in fine-tuning experiments
- Interpretive conclusion linking the fine-tuning dissociation to broader questions about model metacognition
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Unified interpretation of different adaptation methods via UCCT terms
- Claim supported by Perspectives scenario results showing near-100% accuracy post-fine-tuning
- Human data fine-tuning effect is distinct from synthetic emergent misalignment and likely caused by off-policy training
- UCCT's theoretical prediction about how fine-tuning maps onto the anchoring score
- Key claim about the value of the introspection stage, supported by both prefill attack and adversarial prompting experiments
- Demonstrates emergent re-alignment is achievable with minimal data from same domain
- Technique used to impose guardrails on base LLMs, analogized to censorship on the simulator's range of simulacra
- Fine-tuning reduces dr; retrieval increases effective ρd; few-shot k trades budget against bothhypothesis0.756UCCT's unified view of adaptation methods