concept
active
concept:coherence-criterion-for-theory-evaluationCoherence Criterion for Theory Evaluation
Alexander's argument that alongside empirical predictive force, the coherence of a theory's parts is a primary scientific criterion for truth.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- GPT-4.1-mini-rated 0-100 score measuring response coherence; used to detect side effects of steering
- A property that makes a segment of space stand out as a center; determined by symmetry, connectedness, convexity, etc.
- The Mid-Book Appendix organizes the theory's underpinnings into four propositions linking centers, self, unfolding, and deliberate I-directed creation.
- GPT-4.1-mini based score (0-100) measuring clarity, absence of hallucinations, and lack of confusion in generated text
- Finding that relative coherence rankings remain constant across different people and across different cognitive processing tasks (description, memorization, tachistoscopic recognition), establishing coherence as an objective feature of cognitive processing
- GPT-4o scored 0-100 metric from Betley et al. measuring response coherence on open-ended evaluation prompts
- The functional role consciousness plays: minimizing constraint violations between simultaneously active partial models of reality
- Quantifiable measure linking structural properties of configurations to human perception, supporting the mathematical reality of wholeness.