The SCI loop’s three factors exhibit proportionalities analogous to Ohm’s law, with stress as resistance, care as charge, intelligence as current.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Care, intelligence, and stress stand in proportional relationships analogous to charge, current, and resistance in Ohm's law.hypothesis0.811
  Suggests mathematical formalization path for SCI loop dynamics; proposes metrics for efficient care-driven paths.
• An equivalent of Ohm’s law for stress, care, and intelligence would provide a key for understanding the evolution of intelligence across a wide range of spaces.hypothesis0.790
  Speculative suggestion for a mathematical formalization.
• SCI loops can be seen as individuals only by virtue of their dynamics, and are thus intrinsically integrative and transformational.claim0.778
  Argues that individuality is a dynamic construct.
• SCI loops of human and technological agency can be seen as mutually integrative by noticing the stress-transfers between them.claim0.777
  The conclusion that stress transfer integrates loops.
• Care, intelligence, and stress stand in dynamic relation analogous to voltage, current, and resistance in Ohm's law.finding0.774
• Stress, care, and intelligence manifest in continuous loops; successfully overcoming a stress factor through intelligence necessarily introduces new problem spaces.claim0.767
  Explaining the autogenerative nature of SCI loops.
• The SCI loop provides a perspective on agency that does not require recourse to explanatory burdensome notions of permanent and singular essences.claim0.766
  Highlights the dynamic and non-essentialist nature of agency in the proposed framework.
• In the SCI loop, care emerges as the primary driver of evolution.claim0.755
  Asserts an evolutionary role for care within autopoietic systems.