The rhetorical force of diagrammatic expression can never be reduced to absolutes, stable entities, or autonomous effects. The relational system of diagrammatic writing is always emergent and conditional, its values relative, its production of effects inexhaustibly variable and specific.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The diagrammatic workings of relations across elements is crucial to the emergent and contingent identity and operation of any element or feature in the system.claim0.786
  Central argument that identity is produced relationally through spatial dynamics.
• Diagrammatic writing transfers Alexander's latent centers concept to typography.claim0.749
• DAS achieves substantial causal effect even on arbitrary input-output mappings where no causal mechanism should existfinding0.748
  Replication of Wu et al. 2023 finding; DAS expressivity concern validated in CausalGym setup
• The number of spatial moves and refinements possible in diagrammatic systems is nearly infinitehypothesis0.741
  Proposed within the framework that while primary moves are limited, their inflections and attributes are boundless.
• The essence of the process is that it generates coherent, yet quite unpredictable structure, simply by applying a few simple rules to a piece of land and its natural idiosyncracies.quote0.740
  Alexander's distillation of why the dynamic process produces living results that top-down design cannot.
• We hypothesize that a similar 'brutal' and purely geometric process always occurs somewhere in other kinds of unfolding that generate living order — in poetry, dance, social structure, planning, and family relationships.hypothesis0.739
  Extends the brutal geometry thesis beyond architecture into all creative and social domains; acknowledged as not yet confirmed with certainty
• Input-Output Relations Diagrammaticallymethod0.739
• The results generalise readily to non-equilibrium systems where scaling relationships remain similar (e.g., dynamic or localised scaling).claim0.735
  Claim about broader applicability of the scaling argument