The public space of our present-day cities, both legally and metaphorically, no longer belongs to us to any deep extent.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The individuality is taken away. The public space is destroyed.claim0.796
  Critique of conventional large-scale redevelopment.
• The public space, created first as an offshoot from acts of individual occupancy forming private houses, quickly became a thing that many people together cared for and shaped.claim0.795
  Describes the emergent genesis of public space from private acts, not top-down planning
• The private or individual space which is created by money, in today's society, is rarely making or fostering belonging.claim0.793
  Distinguishes wealth-driven uniqueness from the true uniqueness born of living process
• Cities today do not reflect the idiosyncrasies and human characters of people.claim0.779
  States that modern urbanism erases the multitude of differences that constitute our humanity
• In any urban neighborhood, creation of public space and private space, with a proper relationship between the two, is the critical issue.claim0.779
  Key claim establishing the importance of balancing public and private realms.
• The combination of these transformations, taken together, slowly creates public space that is coherent.claim0.775
  Summary of the combined effect of the four element processes.
• A system of hulls of public space will inevitably be created by the unfolding of a living process, if it is truly living and truly allowed to unfold.claim0.772
  The inevitability of hulls as the outcome of living process.
• The public space needs to be made usable, every fifty feet a useful and beautiful place to be, and actually to be the living room of your society.claim0.772
  Prescribes a spatial rhythm for public space to fulfill its social function