claim
active
claim:the-precise-number-fifteen-is-not-significant-but-the-order-of-magnitude-of-the-number-is-significant-there-are-not-five-and-not-a-hundred-but-about-fifteenThe precise number fifteen is not significant, but the order of magnitude of the number is significant—there are not five and not a hundred, but about fifteen
Meta-claim that there is a natural limit to the number of combinatorially distinct ways centers can help each other; it is not easy to think up new effects different from these fifteen
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Everything is vague to a degree you do not realize till you have tried to make it precise.concept0.746Epigraph motivating the necessity of precise semantic specification in programming
- Justification for using the fifteen transformations as a foundation.
- A combinatorial argument that good sequences are astronomically rare, emphasizing the difficulty of discovery.
- Meta-claim about the logical structure of the properties: the more carefully each is defined, the more it relies on the others, revealing their common origin in the field of centers
- Alexander's claim that living structure properties are not incidental but are the operative mechanisms of wholeness-preserving transformation
- Defines the role of the transformations in generating living structure.
- Clarification that levels of scale fails when detail is merely present but not doing anything—as in machine-made doors with superficially many panels that have no real life