claim

active

claim:the-paper-does-not-claim-enlightenment-is-reducible-to-mathematical-structure-phenomenological-experience-belongs-to-a-different-order-of-description

The paper does not claim enlightenment is reducible to mathematical structure; phenomenological experience belongs to a different order of description.

Proposition 3, explicit anti-reductionist stance.

Source paper

extracted_from

A Mathematical Elucidation of Buddhist Enlightenment

(2026) · Susumu Inui

Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count

Papers (1)

paper

A Mathematical Elucidation of Buddhist Enlightenment
mentions

Claims (1)

claim

The paper's elucidation is, in Buddhist terms, merely the finger pointing at the moon — it points toward enlightenment but is not enlightenment.
extends
Explicit acknowledgment of the gap between structural elucidation and first-person realization.

Related by similarity (8)

cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edge

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

Enlightenment is the structural transformation of cognition arising when the reference frames organising experience are transparently recognised as reference frames.claim0.803
The paper's proposed one-sentence unified description of enlightenment.
Enlightenment is the transition to a state in which identification with the ego-centric coordinate system φp0 is dissolved, enabling direct description of the intrinsic geometry of (M,g).claim0.802
Proposition 4.4, differential-geometric elucidation of enlightenment.
Phenomenology itself is a functional structure; phenomenology is the modelclaim0.788
Core resolution claim: phenomenal experience and its functional role coincide; resolving this is key to closing the Hard Problem
The structures where life occurs just cannot be made in any other way — it is a categorical and mathematical must.claim0.785
Enlightenment is not Dkl(P‖Q)=0 but the release of identification with Q itself, recognizing the model as a model.claim0.771
Proposition 4.3, information-geometric elucidation of enlightenment as release rather than optimization.
To create living structure we must find our own contemporary version of the I—a new vision of the universe in which meaning exists, relatedness and self have a primary place, and which is as real for us as God was in Mozart's heart.claim0.764
The central challenge of the chapter: we need a new cosmology with the same existential weight as historical religion.
There are plausible views (e.g., global workspace theory, higher-order theory) on which autonomy entails phenomenal consciousness.claim0.763
Tentative conclusion on the autonomy-consciousness link.
This structural resonance does not mean mathematics proves Buddhism; it shows that human intelligence approaching the same structural truth from different directions can produce overlapping contours.claim0.763
Closing epistemic disclaimer distinguishing structural resonance from proof.