claim
active
claim:the-logistic-fit-for-threshold-behavior-is-a-phenomenological-surrogate-for-interpretability-not-a-mechanistic-derivationThe logistic fit for threshold behavior is a phenomenological surrogate for interpretability, not a mechanistic derivation
Authors' explicit epistemic limitation on the threshold model
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Edward Yi Chang · Kaya, Zeyneb N. · Ethan Chang
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Concepts (1)
concept
- Phenomenological fit P(success)=σ(αS+β) used to summarize sharpness and midpoints.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Caveat about the threshold analysis
- Fit a sigmoid to accuracy vs. k to estimate k50 and phase width.
- Core testable hypothesis of UCCT about the nature of performance transitions under anchoring
- Future work direction; extends current model beyond attentional precision to full space of emotional and metacognitive phenomena.
- Fitting a logistic function to success probability as a function of S or shot count to estimate midpoints and widths.
- Concise statement of the free-energy principle's unification of action and perception.
- Foundational claim of the paper, defining self-evidencing.
- The paper's claim that theoretical convergence across GWT, RPT, HOT, IIT makes the findings non-coincidental