The idea that a building becomes more 'organic' if it has a more complex form, even when based on notions of the interior organization, is almost always wrong.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The great majority of modern buildings are awkward assemblies of unrelated components, lacking the coherence necessary to be living designs.claim0.803
  Aesthetic judgment on modern buildings.
• To be whole, a building must be 'lost' in its surroundings—not separate, but part and parcel of them.claim0.800
  Defines the paradoxical quality of a living whole in architecture.
• the relative harmony or 'life' of a given building may be understood directly from the internal cohesion of the structure... without reference to opinion, prejudice or philosophy, merely as a consequence of the wholeness which exists.quote0.791
  Strong claim that life/beauty is an objective property of the wholeness structure.
• In the best cases, the building form will be interwoven with nature itself, seeming extremely ordinary, not like the work of an architect's hands.claim0.791
• If construction is organized around creating complete wholes by integrated teams, the building will achieve more life than with fragmented trades.hypothesis0.789
  Testable prediction from the integrated wholes argument.
• This is the moment when the building becomes architecture.claim0.787
  The brutal geometric moment — making positive elements, syncopated harmony, massive stones — is what transforms mere building into architecture
• A building's life is not a matter of style but of substance: the presence of living centers.claim0.786
  Distinction between superficial style and deep structure.
• Buildings and objects with living structure enlarge our capacity for relatedness; those without deaden it, even in nature.claim0.785
  Practical consequence for architecture and urbanism.