The geometry of living structure is markedly different in kind from the geometry of design done on a drawing board or on a computer.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Living structure in buildings can only be GENERATED. It cannot be created by brute force from designs.claim0.840
  Core thesis of Book 2, stated at the transition to Part Two.
• The creation of living structure cannot be done in any other way.claim0.838
• If it is a living process, it will create beautiful geometric structure. If it does not create beautiful structure, it cannot truly be a living process.claim0.830
  Beauty and geometry are the talisman by which a living process is known.
• What is the difference between those buildings generated by living process (unfolding and structure-preserving transformations) compared with those buildings created wilfully by arbitrary design moves?question0.829
  Second motivating question for the appendix.
• The schemata created by modern and modernistic architectural efforts in the 20th century are too crude to carry the load of creating living geometry.claim0.828
  Critique of 20th-century modernism's inadequate form language.
• The kind of order that occurs in living structure has a complexity not usually describable by drawings or by architectural images.claim0.823
  Emphasizes the non-pictorial, process-dependent nature of living order.
• What is the difference between living structure and non-living structure?question0.822
  First motivating question for the appendix on classes.
• The shapes of a truly living architecture can only be of this unfolded nature, created step by step dynamically, both in conception and construction.claim0.820
  Universal claim about all living architecture.